A recent study highlights the complex relationship between gun ownership and public safety, suggesting that wider access to firearms might not always result in negative outcomes. Conducted by economists Michael D. Makowsky and Patrick L. Warren, the research explores historical gun control laws during the Jim Crow era in the southern U.S. and their relationship to incidents of lynching against Black individuals, finding that increased firearm access for this community correlated with reduced lynching cases.
This paper underscores the importance of thorough cost-benefit analyses in current gun policy discussions. It reminds policymakers that while the visible costs of gun violence are significant, the potential protective benefits of civilian gun ownership deserve careful consideration, particularly in contexts marked by institutional discrimination. Such insights challenge the prevailing narrative surrounding gun control and invite a deeper examination of firearms’ role in enhancing safety for marginalized groups.
Read full story at www.thehindu.com
Read the full article here