Gunner Quinn
During a recent flight on Air Force One, President Donald Trump defended his controversial decisions to pardon nearly 1,600 individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6 Capitol insurrection, asserting that these actions were “a great thing for humanity.” He claimed that those he pardoned were victims of government assault rather than aggressors, despite clear video evidence of their participation in violent acts against law enforcement and the Capitol. Trump’s comments come as he faces criticism from both opponents and some allies who express concern over the implications of his narrative on the events of that day.
Amidst this backdrop, critics have condemned Trump’s remarks as an attempt to rewrite history, with one political scientist describing them as “absolutely stomach-turning.” The pardons, which include individuals convicted of assaulting police officers, have prompted widespread backlash from legal experts and members of the public who view them as a dismissal of the severity of the Capitol attack. As this story unfolds, the debate surrounding Trump’s decisions continues to raise questions about accountability and the legacy of January 6.
Read full story at www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com
Read the full article here